Call Tracking alternative

Smarfle vs CallTrackingMetrics

CallTrackingMetrics is a contact center with attribution attached, built for businesses that run a phone room. This page is for the ones where the person who answers is also the person who does the work.

Live in 5 minutes · 7 days free · No credit card

What is CallTrackingMetrics?

CallTrackingMetrics, usually shortened to CTM, combines call tracking with contact center software. Trackable numbers and dynamic insertion cover attribution. The telephony side carries call queues, agent seats, skills-based routing, voice menus and call flows built in a visual editor. Healthcare and legal practices buy it for the routing depth and the compliance controls. VoiceAI, added in late 2025, answers calls and books appointments.

Where CallTrackingMetrics works well

Some businesses genuinely run a phone room. Five people signed in, calls queued behind a menu, a supervisor listening, routing that depends on the language the caller picked and which office is open. CTM handles that shape properly, and because the call flow is built visually the routing can be changed by the person who owns the process rather than by a phone vendor.

Where CallTrackingMetrics falls short for service businesses

The gaps service business owners hit when CallTrackingMetrics is the only tool in the stack.

Routing depth for a business with no phone room

Queues, agent seats and a visual IVR builder solve a problem a five-truck trade does not have, while the caller is on hold waiting to be told whether Thursday is free.

Two subscriptions before a job is booked

Tracking is priced separately from the telephony, VoiceAI is charged by the minute above an allowance, and the software that actually runs the work is bought somewhere else again.

Nobody on the call can see the diary

The person answering can route the call anywhere except into the calendar, so a booking becomes a message, a callback and a second conversation about a time already agreed.

Smarfle vs CallTrackingMetrics

Side-by-side feature comparison. We surface what's real. "Limited" or "Depends on plan" means the feature exists with material restrictions.

Feature
Smarfle
CallTrackingMetrics
AI receptionist (answers calls 24/7)
Yes
Limited
Client CRM
Yes
No
Job scheduling and dispatch
Yes
No
Work orders
Yes
No
Invoices
Yes
No
Payment links and auto-charge saved cards
Yes
No
SMS follow-up
Yes
Limited
Email follow-up
Yes
No
Review requests
Yes
No
GBP rank tracking
Yes
No
AI website builder
Yes
No
Client portal
Yes
No
Sends you customer leads (pay-per-lead directory)
Yes
No
Dynamic number insertion on your website
No
Yes
Agent queues and skills-based routing
No
Yes
Visual IVR and call flow builder
No
Yes
Call recording and transcription
Yes
Yes
The call becomes a scheduled job and an invoice
Yes
No

Based on publicly available product information.

Why service businesses choose Smarfle over CallTrackingMetrics

The reasons owners switch, and the reasons they stick.

Booking happens during the call, not after it

The calendar, the customer history and the job list are in the product the call lands in, so whoever picks up can offer a real slot and write it down once. No queue to park anybody in, because the person answering is usually the person who can commit to Thursday.

One number or twenty, with no agent seats

Numbers are bought per branch and given names, each call stores which one was dialed, and nobody pays a phone license to answer them. A business with an office line and a mobile gets recordings, transcripts and a call log without first modeling itself as a contact center.

Spam is screened in front of the line

Carrier verification, caller line type and a press-one screening step sit ahead of the ring, and numbers you block stay countable in the log instead of vanishing. That is the phone problem most trades actually have, which is the twelfth lead-generation cold call before lunch.

Not offered by CallTrackingMetrics

CallTrackingMetrics organizes work you already have. Smarfle also brings you new work.

Smarfle runs a consumer directory of local service businesses and sells the quote requests it captures as pay-per-lead offers, priced flat by trade. You review each lead before paying, at most 3 businesses ever see one request, and repeat customers are always free. Accepted leads land straight in the same CRM that runs your jobs.

Review before you pay

Every quote request arrives masked. Accept it and pay the flat price, or pass for free.

Never resold, never spammed

A request goes to at most 3 local businesses. Duplicates and your existing customers are always free.

Leads become jobs in one tap

An accepted lead is already a client record in your CRM, ready to schedule, quote, and invoice.

Honest take

Best fit when comparing CallTrackingMetrics and Smarfle

A practice with intake staff, a menu and a queue should stay where it is. CTM is a real contact center and Smarfle is not pretending to be one. The business worth looking is the one that bought call tracking software and in practice only ever opens the recordings.

Smarfle vs CallTrackingMetrics pricing compared

The whole stack, line by line, including what each side does not cover.

What you pay for
CallTrackingMetrics
Smarfle
Entry plan
Quoted, by numbers and minutes
Solo $19, 1 user
Mid plan
Quoted, plus agent seats
Starter $99, 5 users
Answering
VoiceAI 12c a minute after 250
From $99, 25c a talk minute
Local rank tracking
Not offered
From $99, 2c a scan point
Website
Not offered
Professional $199
Realistic stack
Tracking plus VoiceAI plus a CRM
$199

CTM prices tracking and telephony separately and the total moves with numbers, minutes and agent seats, so a single headline figure would be misleading.

Migrating from CallTrackingMetrics to Smarfle

A clear, low-risk path. Most teams are live in under a week.

What migration looks like

CTM can keep answering the main line while a second number runs here, which is the low-risk way to find out whether the routing was load-bearing. Most trades learn inside two weeks that it was not. Recordings export before cancellation, and the numbers themselves cannot be ported in, so a new line has to earn its place on the vans before anything is switched off.

CSV import includedFree onboarding help

Frequently asked questions about Smarfle vs CallTrackingMetrics

The questions teams ask before they switch.

No. There is no visual call flow editor, no menu tree and no skills-based routing. A call is answered by a person, or by the AI receptionist, which books, transfers or takes a message based on what the caller wants. If somebody has to press three for billing, CTM does that and Smarfle does not.
No. There are no agent seats and no queues. Plan users are staff who also schedule jobs, raise invoices and work in the field, and the plan counts them as users rather than as phone licenses.
Recording, a speaker-labeled transcript and a written summary are produced on the calls Smarfle handles, billed by the minute rather than sold as a module. What is missing is the analytics layer CTM puts over a large call volume, which matters if somebody is coaching a team on call quality.
On the phone side, probably not. A practice with intake staff and a menu is the exact shape CTM was built for. Smarfle suits the practice that answers its own phone and wants the call, the appointment and the invoice held in one place.
A text goes back automatically, the missed call is logged against the client, and the thread it opens sits in the same inbox as the rest of that customer's messages. Nobody has to notice the missed call for the customer to hear from the business.
No. Numbers are provisioned inside the platform, A2P brand and campaign registration is handled for you, and calls bill by the minute. There is no carrier account to open and nothing to configure between two vendors.

Try Smarfle instead of CallTrackingMetrics

7 days free · No credit card · All features included.